Sign In

Site Under Construction
User Registration Not Available.
Beta Launch Coming Soon…

Contact Us to receive updates.

Topics
Skip Navigation Links
Health Conditions
Skip Navigation Links
Quick Links
Sponsors
Public >> Systematic Reviews \ Meta-Analysis

Modifiable worker risk factors contributing to workplace absence: a stakeholder-centred best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews.
Author(s): Wagner,Shannon; White,Marc; Schultz,Izabela; Murray,Eleanor; Bradley,Susan M; Hsu,Vernita; McGuire,Lisa; Schulz,Werner / 2014
Journal: Work (Reading, Mass.)
Publication Year: 2014 Volume: 49 Issue: 4 Pages: 541-58
PMID: 24004777
Summary:
BACKGROUND: A challenge facing stakeholders is the identification and translation of relevant high quality research to inform policy and practice. This study engaged academic and community stakeholders in conducting a best evidence-synthesis to identify modifiable risk and protective worker factors across health conditions impacting work-related absence.
OBJECTIVES: To identify modifiable worker disability risk and protective factors across common health conditions impacting work-related absence.
METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, CINHAL, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, BusinessSourceComplete, and ABI/Inform from 2000 to 2011. Quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods systematic reviews of work-focused population were considered for inclusion. Two or more reviewers independently reviewed articles for inclusion and methodological screening.
RESULTS: The search strategy, expert input and grey literature identified 2,467 unique records. One hundred and forty-two full text articles underwent comprehensive review. Twenty-four systematic reviews met eligibility criteria. Modifiable worker factors found to have consistent evidence across two or more health conditions included emotional distress, negative enduring psychology/personality factors, negative health and disability perception, decreased physical activity, lack of family support, poor general health, increased functional disability, increased pain, increased fatigue and lack of motivation to return to work.
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic reviews are limited by availability of high quality studies, lack of consistency of methodological screening and reporting, and variability of outcome measures used.
Public Key Messages
    Not Available
Scientific Key Messages
    Not Available
Scientific Rating:
  See Results
Research Strengths
    Not Available
Research Weakness
    Not Available
Implementation
    Not Available
Employer Characteristics:
    Not Available
Applicability to Small Employer:
    Not Available
Plain Language Summary    Full Article
 
Rate This Article
Rate This Article
  Join Discussion
JoinDiscussion
  Custom Print
Custom Print
  E-Alerts
E-Alerts
  Email Summary
Email Summary
The trial period for SharePoint List Custom Actions has expired. Please visit KWizCom site to purchase a license.